Tuesday, August 4, 2009
A Peter Roff Blog post
Ford's Auto Bailout Lesson: Consumers Like Rugged Corporate Individualism
By Peter Roff, Thomas Jefferson Street blog
It should come as no surprise, as Rasmussen Reports said Tuesday, that the recent government bailouts of General Motors and the Chrysler Corporation have affected public attitudes toward the U.S. automakers. But rather than pitch in to help the struggling manufacturers continue to stay afloat, 46 percent of Americans indicated to Rasmussen that they were more likely to buy a new car from Ford—if they were, in fact, buying a new car—because it did not take government money in order to keep its doors open.
Call it a competitive advantage for Ford. By staying away from the bailout, the company has potentially increased its share of the market place by a significant amount, especially among those who insist on "buying America" as a political statement.
Only 13 percent of those responding in the national telephone survey said Ford's refusal to request government assistance made them less likely to purchase a car from the automaker in the future. But that's less than the 19 percent of Americans who said that someone in their family or a friend chose not to buy from Chrysler or GM because of the government bailout.
In additional good news for the carmaker, 51 percent of those Rasmussen identifies as "investors" said they were more likely to buy a Ford, along with 41 percent of non-investors. Those working in the private sector were, by 11 points, more likely than government employees to purchase a Ford because it didn't seek a bailout.
Not so much by engaging in a rugged defense of the capitalist system, as founder Henry Ford might have done, but simply by staying out of the way, Ford has improved its public image. This may be a useful lesson for other large corporations—which many times act as though they believe doing things that work against their own interests, as when oil companies provide corporate support for environmental groups—about the way to the heart of the American public.
"The chief business of the America people is business," President Calvin Coolidge famously told the American Society of Newspaper Editors back in 1925. It is not, he might have added, looking for a government bailout.
The Onion Info-Graphic Article on The Auto Bailout
Auto Industry Crisis
The big three American automobile manufacturers spent much of last week lobbying Congress for a portion of the economic bailout, lest they go under. How did they get to this point?
1970: United Auto Workers fights for and wins 12 paid hangover days a year for its members
1977: Inspired by the hit motion picture The Spy Who Loved Me, Chrysler wastes four years trying to manufacture a car that turns into a submarine
1985: Ford spends the majority of its R & D budget designing sweet new "Chevy Sucks" decals
1991: Sales of the Pontiac Trans Am plunge after the car officially loses its pussy magnet designation
1997: Having meticulously crafted the 1998 Dodge Dakota to boast best-in-class payload and towing capacity, Chrysler decides to rest on its laurels for the next decade
1999: Chevrolet is sued for millions after it is discovered there is already a song named "Like a Rock" with the exact same lyrics and melody
2000: GM unveils the Buick Carbon, America's first mass-produced gas-coal hybrid vehicle
2001: At the Los Angeles Auto Show, GM introduces the Pontiac Aztek to raucous laughter, then stunned silence, then blood curdling screams of horror
2006: Oprah says her new favorite thing is non-American cars
H James (Freethinker2) wrote:
They just don't stop looting the public treasury, do they? Soon the standard of living for the great unwashed will be but a distant, pleasant memory. Do we really need more civility in politics?
Steven Bailey (tempyy) wrote:
James; yes I know what you mean, any time I mention the Bilderberg group, trilateral com. or the C.F.L. on yahoo buzz those post never get put up. and after watching the Obama deception on you tube, twice and checking their sources.. I have grave concerns for the future of our country and way of life..
James Stewart (ArtbyStewart) wrote:
Steven,
You are right, but you have to be careful.
"Campaign For Liberty", Ron Paul website, is a grass-roots organization to, among other things, get the federal government to respect the constitution. Monetary policy transcends party politics, and his website is a great place to see real effort in action.
Having said that, C.F.L. is now on some "lists" because of this stance.
Some believe Lincoln and Kennedy lost their lives because of monetary policy views, but who am I to say.
Steven Bailey (tempyy) wrote:
It looks to me like what Jefferson, Lincoln, Kenedy, and others who warned about banks and the company that grow up around them are right.. we need to revolt and take back this country from them
James Stewart (ArtbyStewart) wrote:
We are at extreme risk of a total loss of faith in our financial markets. We need better ideas, one is an audit of the fed.
We have zombie banks, and everyone is hoarding cash.
The train should have been allowed to wreck last year. We would be putting it back on track by now, not continually trying to slow it down.